We know solid matter as something we can grasp and feel. In everyday life, we think that the solidity is a proof of a concrete structure of the matter that cannot be penetrated without imposing a permanent change to the structure.
Let's think a little. What does matter consist of? Molecules and atoms, we know this much. But when we go inside this atom structure, we find a structure that largely consists of empty space - not matter. It is actually interaction with some kind of an energy field when we touch a physical object.
In an atom, there are protons and neutrons in the core, and electrons, of a considerably smaller size and weight, circulating the core. In between the electron field(s) and the core, there is empty space - lots of it.
The core of an atom is in diameter (from charge radius) only of the scale 1/1000 - 1/20000 of the diameter of the atom (from covalent radius). It seems that if we extrapolate that there are particles small enough in the universe, they can travel deep into matter without altering the structure.
We know the particle/waveform duality of light: in some circumstances, light is best described (and taken into calculations) using its wave-like behavior, while in others, it is more beneficial to apply the particle-like behavior. Still we don't understand, in the deepmost sense, what light actually is.
Let's have a look at gravitation. We know that gravitation is the force holding the structure of the macro-scale universe together. My question is, why don't we generalize the law of gravitation to the particle level, and interpret the wave-like behavior of light using gravitation and simple statistics: although the movement of photons (particles of light) would be completely random in any field containing matter, the average would result in seemingly consistent, measurable behavior that we observe today. Some photons are absorbed, others get reflected away, and the rest continue their statistically-defined route through the matter.
1) The wave-like behavior of light is a result of micro-level gravitation.
It is easily seen that photons should be extremely small in size, with an extremely small (computational) mass, and traveling in extremely large numbers, for them to be able to traverse through fields of matter without (the observable light) scattering all around. The smaller the mass, the closer the photon must pass an atom nucleus for a gravitational effect. The bigger the numbers, the better the statistics works, feeding our everyday observations. The smaller the size, the more photons fit into any pulse of light. (However, this all will be decided by calculations.)
Generalizing a little, it is a measured fact that the wavelength of a photon remains the same while it travels through the universe. To account for this observation, it seems that we would need to find the mass of a photon from a calculation in which it is tied to the wavelength of the respective light. This would mean that the speed at which light travels is also relational to the corresponding photon's (computational) rest mass and thus wavelength. The constant that we know as 'the speed of light' would then just be a maximum limit to any speed in the 4-space (the everyday 3D space combined with the dimension of time).
2) Speed of light in a vacuum depends on its wavelength, while the limes of the velocity of any particle or object in the 4D space-time is c, as in E=mc2.
It is worth to note that with this theory, the wave-like behavior of light varies over different kinds of fields of observation. Specifically, there is no wave-like behavior in a vacuum; however, as soon as the photon arrives at a field of matter, the wave-like behavior is back. We should find out which measurements really happen in the field of observation and which ones actually happen inside the equipment itself.
Now, let's take a closer look at a single photon on its way through a field of observation. If there is any matter in the field, or if there is a gravitational force in effect, the energy and the path of the photon will change on the way as a function of time and the parameters of the field. Specifically, the gravitational force that bends the trace of the photon in the field will change the kinetic energy of the photon. Sometimes, the energy will become smaller, sometimes greater, depending on how close the photon goes to the gravitational center. In the case of gaining energy, if the photon is already traveling at its maximum speed limited by the laws of the universe, we have a big question: where does the extra energy go? Having the law of preserving energy, the gained energy must somehow stay within the photon so that it can later, when the environment allows, be consumed.
Physicists and mathematicians have long talked about the universe having more dimensions than our common 4-space. It all seems probable. The problem is, we don't have the mappings to these dimensions for any other use than pure mathematical calculations. That is, the physics is still missing.
Let's figure 5D, and give the new dimension the property of energy. This means that for any point in our 3D world and universe, there is a point, a value, or even a function of values in the energy dimension, and going further, for every point in our 4D universe, the same is true. In other words, any point in time and space has a parameter of energy, and these parameters together define any one point in the 5D energy-timespace.
Let's assume that when a particle is accelerated enough in the 4D universe, it is enough to create a pulse that makes the particle plunge into the fifth dimension, disappear from our universe, and plunge back into the 4D universe after the 'extra' energy of the pulse has been consumed. This would mean that at the micro level, the universe has a fluid-like characteristic, described by E=mc2. (There was a recent experiment of an accelerated neutrino traversing faster than the speed of light which would be explained by this theory.)
Back to the macro scale. It has been calculated that the universe consists almost 3/4 of dark, non-observable energy, 1/4 of dark, non-observable matter, and only 4% of visible matter and energy. It has been observed that the universe is expanding in an accelerating manner, and dark energy has been proposed as a reason for this acceleration, equally distributed over the universe and rejecting other dark energy. It is tempting to assume that dark energy is actually energy residing in the fifth dimension; from this invisible part of our universe, there would be vectorial mappings to the common three dimensions, which would then result in the rejecting described above. The vectorial mappings might have been decided in the history of the universe, for example, when galaxies of matter have collided with ones of antimatter (which results in pure energy).
3) There is a dimension of energy in the universe that, considering all parameters, is only existent to the minimum possible extent at and in any given time and space.
4) The dimension of energy is bound to other dimensions of our universe.
Now something completely different: the human observation, processing and action system is a neural network that operates with electricity. We are humans, we are living, and our system operates with something as simple as an easily describable force of physics. It's just the complexity of the neural network of our brain that makes us not see this simplicity. But is it really all so simple? Are we only machines of electricity? There are other forces in play, most importantly the chemistry of our feelings, but is the real Self really only a machine like this?
What we are is a part of life with a body, thoughts, feelings, understanding of life and our surroundings. What our neighbor is, is the same - just often with different experiences, and hence, different patterns of behavior. And - what any form of life is, is eventually, essentially the same.
We consist of atoms, molecules, and all there is in them. If the world and the universe are 5D, we are 5D as well. In a prepared or otherwise suitable state of our being, we are capable of interacting in 5D, reading pulses from the 5D reality - or even writing (to) them. The interesting thing about this is that if another being is also in the same state, there is a possibility to communicate, and this communication is not fully tied to time.
Have you ever had a dream that was, somehow, strangely connected to the real world - to other beings, they having had the same or a similar dream? Figure your imagination as a vast, immense, endless shared space in which you can create, but also find. Figure other people doing the same, and figure an energy pulse that all the people of earth put their effort to. Now, try to figure a limit to what is possible to do.
6) It is possible to read and control pulses in the 5D space to create connections and alter the reality.
--
A prerequisite for truly benefiting of 5D is that we find our new place in the world and universe, respecting all life and putting all effort to minimize suffering around us. We must not push - all our behavior must be as gentle as possible. Only this way we will be able to truly open our self - for all there really is.
It should also be noted that a new dimension does not limit us, but opens up new possibilities. Science may easily later find use for even more physical dimensions. Could these really be used for our mental development towards a new stage of humanity?
Posts
